Saturday, March 22, 2014
Cigarettes, e-Cigarettes, NRT and the Illness Industry (big pharma vs big tobacco)
If you've been even remotely following the electronic-cigarette debate, you're aware that one of the big arguments used to support the possible regulation of the e-cig is the strong belief that vaping actually brings legitimacy and encourages smoking. Now, there is another study recently released with groundbreaking data that shows that actually there is a link between the use of the e-cigarette and tobacco cigarettes among kids in the United States.
JAMA Pediatrics is a Journal started in 1911. One study published in the journal shows "adolescents who have or are using e-cigs are less likely to have given up smoking than those who did not use e-cigarettes." The conclusion was based on 40,000 adolescents who completed surveys from the CDC. In a nutshell, they concluded that:
"use of e-cigarettes does not discourage, and may encourage, conventional cigarette use among U.S. adolescents."
Critics out there will say that "while the study does show a correlation between smoking and e-cig use, there is no evidence to show that the use of e-cigs will directly lead to smoking." [whatever] Unfortunately, this study comes at a time when the FDA is about to regulate the juvenile e-cigarette market within the United States. [why has it taken so long anyway?]
E-cigarettes are unregulated, which enables companies to aggressively market them and make claims that the e-cigarette is "relatively safe." This 1940's and 50's style marketing can not be used with conventional cigarettes. That being said as opposition to vaping is building an unlikely backer is funding the move against these reduced-risk products.
This is where it's going to start getting scary...
One of the biggest forces working against the introduction of electronic cigarettes is big pharma. No big surprise, right? It's the why that's disturbing. Big pharma makes it's money from treating disease. That includes smoking related illness. If there is less disease to treat, then profits will drop. That would be bad news for the companies and shareholders.
Now, let's throw in NRT. Nicotine Replacement Therapy. The gum, the patch, the lozenge. GlaxoSmithKline is the leading marketer of these products. Clearly, if smokers who are trying to quit turn to e-cigarettes rather than NRT, GlaxoSmithKline will lose money. Can you see why big pharma would want to use this study to put additional pressure on the FDA to regulate the electronic cancer stick?
If the e-cig was brought under the umbrella of the FDA, they could then require the manufacturers of the e-cig to register and pay fees, list the ingredients in their products [most important part], obtain prior approval for new products, and restrict online sales and marketing to children. [second most important part]
Big Tobacco lied it's ass off for 60 years. Look, I'm not a huge fan of the FDA as I believe they are in bed with Big Pharma and it's strictly about a government agency regulating a free market to support the largest financial contributers. This puts peoples lives at risk for the sake of the almighty dollar and that crosses the line from old fashioned healthy capitolism to evil and greed. That being said, Big Tobacco is the greater of these two evils and must be stopped. They are buying up e-cigarette companies to hedge thier tobacco bet and marketing smokeless tobacco products as well. With the lack of regualtion in e-cigarettes, it won't be long before some "doctor" will be doing an infomercial talking about how it's just "vapor."
Bottom line, don't get sucked into the hype and don't financially reward evil. If you're in a battle with nicotine, sooner or later, in order to win, you'll have to cut it off and out. NRT and e-cigarettes exist because people have allowed themselves a physical and mental addiction. These people have been sold a bill of goods that they are weak and incapable of stopping smoking by themselves and they they need NRT or e-cigarettes to transition. I call bullshit!
Don't allow yourself to get cought in the loop. Heroine to methadone to marijuanna to a really bad day and back to heroine then methadone to pot to clean for a while until another really bad day. See the cycle?
Cigarettes, patch, screw up and smoke with the patch, no patch, cigarettes, gum, off for 6 weeks, bad day, just one, 3 days later buy a pack, back to full time smoker, Chantix, WEIRD F#$%ing dreams, no Chantix, then clean for 4 months... until standing outside a club with your buzz on, bum smoke... see the loop? Why? Knock that shit off! Stop trying to quit!
Want a fool proof plan? I mean isn't that what you're after? People are so much stronger than Big Pharma and Big Tobacco want you to believe. If you're ready to step up and off the addiction loop, read this book then use this book: www.StopDontQuit.com